The Inside Press

Magazines serving the communities of Northern Westchester

Vicki de Vries

A Dream Comes True – How 63 Acres of Land in North Castle Became a Nature Preserve

by

When it comes to open space preservation, a partnership is typically involved. Recently, 63 acres adjacent to a 700-acre forest were preserved, thanks to the partnership with the Westchester Land Trust, the Town of North Castle and New York State. 

That sounds simple, but what it took to achieve that dream goal is quite remarkable.

Could The Dream Ever Come True?

Town of North Castle Supervisor Michael Schiliro had known about this property “since at least 2007.” Over the years, the Town’s Open Space Committee had put the 63 acres on a special list of properties to preserve, and the Town Board had had its eye on it too.

So, why did it take until 2021 for the 63 acres to become a nature preserve?  

The property had changed ownership a few times. Schiliro said there was “concern that a private owner would try to develop the land, and the dream of preserving it would be lost forever.”

Then, in 2019, the property went up for sale. Schiliro was elated when the owners Robyn and Vito Errico approached him: “‘A lot of people are interested in it…. Perhaps the Town could take possession, and we could protect it?'”  

Schiliro contacted Kerri Kazak, Chair of the Open Space Committee, to see if they could “explore ways to preserve this property.” Kazak was eager to contact President Lori Ensinger of the Westchester Land Trust (WLT), which also had had a keen interest in the property.

Kazak had full confidence that a land trust partnership was viable because the Town had worked with the Westchester Land Trust “for years,” and “the WLT is the expert on land preservation in Westchester County [and Putnam] and an incredible resource for municipalities.”

WLT President Lori Ensinger clarified that a land trust is “a non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve environmentally significant land in perpetuity.”

Land preservation sounds great, but what made these 63 acres so deserving of preservation? Simply put, they sit on top of a sand-and-gravel drinking water aquifer.

How The Dream Took Shape

“Lori Ensinger thought the property would be the perfect candidate for a New York State water quality grant,” said Kazak, “and the Westchester Land Trust applied for the grant.”  

Securing the million-dollar grant was a labor of love that required such things as property appraisals, surveys, an environmental review, and a lot of legal work. It took two years to complete the complex transaction “because it was partially funded by the Town and by New York State with the remainder funded by WLT,” according to Ensinger. 

Supervisor Schiliro commented: “Talk about a remarkable achievement! Then, Covid hit, putting us a year and a half or so behind in the process.” Finally, in late autumn of 2021, the property was purchased by the Westchester Land Trust with the Town of North Castle contributing $250,000. All the parties involved breathed a sigh of relief.

“The entire Open Space Committee is absolutely thrilled,” said Kazak. “Preservation of this property has been the goal of so many people for so long that to see it become a reality is extremely gratifying.” 

Ensinger praised North Castle Supervisor Schiliro for being “fabulous throughout this entire process” and gave high marks to Kazak and the Open Space Committee for their excellent input and follow-through. 

But Ensinger gives “the ultimate credit” to the landowner, who “could have just listed the property for sale and sold it to a private party.”

It took “great team effort to protect pristine land that I’ve wanted protected for 14 years,” said Schiliro. Perseverance, the art of not giving up, that he learned from his beloved mother, clicked together with “the right team and culminated in something really good.” 

Schiliro said, “It happened because everybody was chipping in–our Board, Kerri, Lori, my Confidential Secretary Mindy Berard, Councilmember José Berra, Town Attorney Roland Baroni, and Robyn and Vito Errico.”

Schiliro further reminisced by invoking the line from his favorite movie Field of Dreams: “There comes a time when all the cosmic tumblers have clicked into place, and the Universe opens itself up for a few seconds to show you what is possible.” 

So, dreams can come true, and the 63-acre property preservation is an example that one did.

How the Dream Benefits the Community

Residents of North Castle should be very pleased that their drinking water is protected. The picture could have been different, said Ensinger: “If the 63-acre property were developed into ten homes or potentially had a commercial or light industrial use, that could have had a significant negative effect on the water resource.”

Another benefit that residents can look forward to, likely in a year or so, is the walking trail that New York State has approved. 

Then, there is the benefit of better air quality. Since the property is next to Highway 684, “the woodland serves to naturally filter air pollutants and particulates,” said Ensinger. This type of land ensures “the permanent connectivity of large blocks of forest” and “contributes to regional efforts to combat climate change.”

But the benefits don’t stop there.

Steven DiFalco, land project coordinator for WLT, said the property has “different habitats that host a diversity of plant and wildlife species… an upland forest with rock outcroppings, a pond, wetlands and a vernal pool that serves as an important habitat for amphibians,” such as wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Plus a waterfall. Who knew!

And Supervisor Schiliro chimed in with possibly the best benefit of all: “The land is protected forever. It was easy to think that we would never be able to secure this property.

“But in comparison to how many years this land will now be protected–for hundreds of years–it was worth keeping the dream project on the front burner.”

A Sweep in Time — What You Need To Know about Riverkeeper’s Volunteer Event

by

Congratulations to Riverkeeper.org on its 10th Anniversary of Sweep, the annual event bringing community volunteers together to clean up parks and shorelines along the Hudson River!

Jen Benson, who has served as Sweep Coordinator for six years, planned the milestone event with help from assistant Corey Watanabe. The exciting news is that in spite of Covid-19, Sweep was a great success: “We had an explosion of interest–2,607 people at 147 sites. That’s a record for us!”

Most astonishing of all, volunteers collected 2,056 bags of trash, 2.7 tons of recycling, and two tons of tires, as well as other large debris including such things as couches, toilets, metal pipes, plywood, barrels, ropes, and foam blocks.

How did Sweep 2021 deal with the ubiquitous pandemic guidelines? The biggest challenge was “site capacity,” referring to how many volunteers could be placed at a site. This year, some sites needed to have fewer volunteers. All of the sites fully complied with social distancing and mask requirements.

Sweep Means More Than Meets the Eye

Jen, who moved to a new position at Riverkeeper, reflected on her six years of coordinating Sweep: “Riverkeeper Sweep has become a prime example of our approach to work together across a vast region to help restore the Hudson.”

Monica Dietrich, Senior Membership Manager, who stepped in to support the volunteer effort until a new Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator was hired, said that Riverkeeper Sweep is “way more than a single day of service for the Hudson River. It represents a collaborative effort between the Riverkeeper team and local partners,” people who care about their communities and want to help in some way.

As of September 19, Katie Leung has assumed the role of Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator. In addition to handling Sweep, she “will be overseeing Riverkeeper’s year-round volunteer opportunities–from habitat restoration projects to administrative support.” Monica is especially pleased that Katie will be key in re-envisioning and launching the Ambassador program “for dedicated volunteers who can represent Riverkeeper at community events.”

Katie Leung said, “I hope to carry on the great and inspiring work that my colleagues laid down already…. The groundwork is there for me… and I aim to continue the effort of getting volunteers who are willing to help in Sweep and other service opportunities onboard.”

Participating in Sweep does not require membership in Riverkeeper. But joining Riverkeeper is easy. In fact, a donation as small as a dollar snags you a membership in this worthwhile organization. That membership, Monica said, “helps to make it possible for us to protect and restore the Hudson River as well as to safeguard drinking water sources.”

Plans for 2022

If you and your family, neighbors and friends are interested in participating in Sweep 2022, jot the tentative date of Saturday, May 7, on your calendars!

Katie and Monica encourage readers to check out www.riverkeeper.org/sweep and “sign up to be on our mailing list.” Interested in leading a site or recommending a site that you think could use a community clean-up? Don’t hesitate to email Katie at kleung@riverkeeper.org.

Given the outstanding success of Sweep events and their positive impact on our environment, why not become part of this coming year’s 11th Annual Sweep?

“I Must Go Down to the River Again…”

by

Riverkeeper’s patrol boat logs more than 5,000 nautical miles a year along the Hudson River, from the Mohawk and Upper Hudson down the Estuary to New York Harbor. The boat provides a deterrent to polluters, a platform for research, and a means of educating and connecting with the public. Its “home port” is Westerly Marina in Ossining.
PHOTO COURTESY OF RIVERKEEPER

Are visions of fishing, swimming, boating, kayaking and gardening swirling in your head? Obviously, the common denominator in these fun pursuits is w-a-t-e-r.

Like the Hudson River, the largest body of water among us, water is a year-round commodity that we easily take for granted, but shouldn’t. So much revolves around this amazing body of water, which the Mahican Indians named Muh-he-kun-he-tuk, “the river that flows both ways.”

Volunteers clean up the Sing Sing Kill, a Hudson River tributary, in Ossining during Riverkeeper Sweep on May 4, 2019.
PHOTO BY GARETH HOUGHAM

What Makes the Hudson River So Special?

Named after Henry Hudson, the English navigator who visited the river in his schooner Half Moon circa 1609, the Hudson River makes its 315-mile journey from Lake Tear of the Clouds in the Adirondack Mountains to New York Harbor before blending in with the Atlantic Ocean.

Extending for around 153 miles, the lower part of the Hudson is a tidal estuary, meaning that it “ebbs and flows with the ocean tide,” per Riverkeeper.org. It contains a combination of salty ocean water and freshwater from tributaries, aka small streams and creeks, all stretching from New York Harbor to Troy, NY.

Most people don’t realize that the Hudson River “supports a biologically rich environment, making it an important ecosystem for various species of aquatic life” for whom it “provides critical habitats and essential spawning and breeding grounds,” say the Riverkeeper’s proponents.

Riverkeeper.org, which started over 50 years ago as the Hudson River Fishermen’s Association, plays a major role in protecting the Hudson River’s ecology and the drinking water supply. Dan Shapley, its Water Quality Program Director since 2014, shared some interesting facts about Hudson River water quality that apply specifically to Ossining and Briarcliff Manor, as well as to other river communities.

For example, “The Hudson is only as clean as its tributaries…. In Ossining, it’s our [Riverkeeper’s] job to take care of the small streams like the Sing Sing Kill and Sparta Brook….” That makes sense since whatever goes into the streams ends up in the Hudson.

Village of Ossining Mayor Victoria Gearity highlighted the aesthetic aspect of what’s known as “the Sing Sing Kill Greenway,” which has become a wonderful place to walk. In her February 10th “message” to residents, she noted: “The Sing Sing Kill Greenway began as an infrastructure project whose purpose was to protect the Hudson River from contamination by encasing in concrete the sanitary sewer line that runs through this tributary. Modest upgrades transformed the project to become a greenway, with a vision to eventually connect pedestrians all the way to Water Street from downtown.”

And Dan Shapley added: “The Sing Sing Kill, particularly, is such a community asset, with the greenway trail that runs along it. It’s something we should cherish and protect.”

Shapley’s passion for the Hudson River comes out loud and clear: “The Hudson River is an amazing engine of life for the Atlantic Ocean, a source of drinking water for more than 100,000 people, and a source of joy for those of us who paddle or swim in it or visit the water’s edge.”

This time of year, it’s important to note that as one moves “away from shorelines or tributaries,” Shapley said, “water quality is often safe for swimming… However, nearer to the shoreline, water quality is much more variable, and is often risky for swimming after rain.” So, for communities along the shoreline, such as Ossining and Briarcliff, swimming might be a problem.

However, Shapley continued: “…Ossining beach at Louis Engel Park is right on the cusp of meeting the EPA’s criteria for a safe swimming beach.” Since “water quality is so close to meeting EPA’s threshold for safe swimming, we and the elected leaders of Ossining (Town and Village) have been looking for opportunities to expand public recreation at the beach.” That’s good news particularly for post-COVID times.

Meanwhile, Ossining-area residents will have to be content with a number of other water-related activities.

William Garrison, the Village of Ossining’s Superintendent of Recreation and Parks, cited the popular kayaking tours and lessons, a sailing program, and the Spray Park, which is “a designated area with special spouts that squirt water for young children and their parents to cool off during the hot summer days.”

Keeping the River Clean

The recreational benefits of the Hudson River are greatly enhanced by Sweep, Riverkeeper’s annual one-day service event. Co-directed by Jen Benson and Nick Mitch, Sweep coordinates 2,000 volunteers who “sweep up” trash and debris from 120 locations along the Hudson River Watershed and its tributaries. So, how much trash has Sweep scooped up over the years?

“Over the last eight years,” Benson said, “Sweep projects have removed 259 tons of debris [riverwide], including 28.6 tons of recycling.” And in Ossining alone, Shapley noted, 3.5 tons of trash (7,009 lbs) have been removed. And 60+ storm drains have been “stenciled,” meaning that the drains were marked with reminders “that trash on the street reaches our streams via storm drains and pipes.”

What an astonishing amount of junk. I cringed just hearing those figures.

Recreational and water-quality issues aside, Riverkeeper and other groups, along with elected officials from the Village and the Town of Ossining and Briarcliff Manor, also have their eyes on the future of the Hudson River–and with some level of concern.

In discussing the importance of the Hudson River, Ossining Town Supervisor, Dana Levenberg, stressed that the Hudson is “critical for economic development, recreation, and commerce. It is a defining characteristic of our Town and Village.”

But “… what keeps me ‘up at night’ is the idea that the Metro North railroad line along the Hudson River will not exist in 80 years if nothing is done. The culprit? Sea-level rise causing coastline changes.”

“Sea-level rise causing coastline changes”? That sounds almost ominous.

Levenberg went on to explain: “The Metro North line is the life force of our Hudson Valley. It’s either going to need to be raised seriously by an awful lot or moved or replaced with alternative transportation. Either way, this is going to be a multi-million dollar project in the coming years…. As sea levels rise and climate change impacts our shorelines, we need to plan for short-, medium- and long-term changes effectively.”

For both Town Supervisor Levenberg and Victoria Gearity, Mayor of the Village of Ossining, “the critical question is ‘How can we embrace and take advantage of rising-water levels so that it ends up improving our communities and not destroying them?'”

The same sentiment goes for the Village of Briarcliff, which has a more modest stretch of coastline with which to deal. Village of Briarcliff Manager, Philip E. Zegarelli, explained that there’s “a limited area of water access,” which is known as Scarborough Park.

Scarborough Park

Commuters on the Hudson Line are aware of Scarborough as a train stop along the Hudson. But does everyone know that five out of the six acres constitute the 97-year-old Scarborough Park, an acre of useable land with a dock and a lot of potential?

This park land is currently “being addressed under a capital project–the Scarborough Park Restoration Project.” Zegarelli pointed out its purpose: “restore and stabilize the shoreline,” which has been subject to “constant storm and tidal effects of the Hudson River.”

Like Ossining, it too will have to deal with the impact of sea-level changes in the future. Meanwhile, Briarcliff Manor residents and visitors are encouraged “to use the area for picnicking, for enjoying the gorgeous river sunsets, and for fishing.”

And there are always the small lakes that Briarcliff Manor Mayor Steven Vescio says have “great trail ways,” which have been enhanced, “making them more enjoyable for our residents to hike or bike along them.”

So what do you say? Perhaps a trip down by the riverside to the Ossining or the Briarcliff Manor coastline is indeed an idea whose time has come.

For Riverkeeper programming during the pandemic, be sure to visit riverkeeper.org for rescheduled and/or online events.

Preserving a Piece of History at First Baptist Church: A New Kind of Steeple Chase

by

PHOTO courtesy of First Baptist Church

Remember when ISIS fighters totally destroyed centuries-old religious sites sacred to the Buddhists and other groups a few years ago?  Many people had a sense of outrage that any group would have the arrogance to destroy what others considered holy.

That’s why when I heard about a majestic church building – First Baptist Church – in need of repair here in Ossining, I wanted to investigate what had happened to it. My second thought was “Perchance, I can aid in its efforts to raise funds for a restoration project.” And, fortunately, the damage done to First Baptist Church, which celebrates its 230th “birthday” this year, is the result of wear-and-tear over decades, not terrorists.

Situated in the strategic area “where Ossining was first established,” First Baptist Church is the second building to stand in the triangle of land buttressing South Highland Avenue, Main Street and Church Street.

The Historic Roots of the Church

The church’s origins date back to Captain Elijah Hunter, a Revolutionary War “aide-de-camp” to George Washington, who employed him as a spy against the British forces. Hunter, who also became a church deacon, opened his home to services for a Baptist church group in April of 1786, in the area of Broad Avenue [formerly called Hunter Lane]. By October 11 of that year, there were fourteen members. Months later, the congregation had grown to 30 members who continued to meet in homes. In 1811, the educationally minded group started the first Sunday School in the Village of Ossining.

On April 15, 1815, the church incorporated as “The First Baptist Church, Village of Sing Sing, Town of Mt. Pleasant, NY.” A laudable fact is that the church was integrated with blacks and whites worshipping together. According to the church’s website in the early years, slaves and their masters attended services. Both were considered full members of the congregation, and treated equally in the church.” Then, in 1890, when entreated to help establish a “black Baptist church” in the area, First Baptist Church lent its full support to what soon became Star of Bethlehem Church on Spring Street.

On June 3, 1874, the current brick building on Church Street was dedicated. Its cost back then was $75,000, mere pennies by today’s standards ($1.59 million), but a small fortune for that day. The congregation had grown to 197 members.

Surviving the Centuries

Over the past 146 years, the current Gothic Revival-style building with its uniquely designed quatrefoils and design elements (built by J. Walsh) has withstood the architectural assault of time. Its original spire from 1874 was blown off during a severe storm twenty years later. In its place a more impressive steeple was installed consisting of a main spire with four smaller spires flanking it on all four corners.

Over the years, various repairs have been made on the church building, as one would expect. Repairing the three-story stained glass window earlier in this millennium was a major undertaking costing thousands of dollars partially paid for by a grant, according to then restoration chair Marcia McCraw.

Bart Sellazzo, a long-time Ossining resident and church member, has gotten used to the idea of things needing repair. As the official bell-ringer, he rings the steeple bell every Sunday at the beginning of the church service. One day, as Bart was ringing the bell, the rope holding the four-foot bell broke. He didn’t describe it as such, but it was probably a miracle of sorts that the bell didn’t crash through the floor of the steeple.

Then, there was the damage caused by the pigeons that had encamped inside the steeple. Bart recalls the day he and church attendee Bill Gallagher went to investigate the problem with the squawking birds. As they assumed, the pigeons had made a mess of the steeple by leaving excrement on the floor. When Bart and Bill climbed the ladders to reach the steeple, they had even more to deal with – deceased birds.

When the current steeple damage was brought to light by a passerby on March 13, 2014, Bart, a painter by trade, was at a job in Connecticut. “You’ve got a problem down here” was the message from former Ossining fire chief Matt Scarduzio, who had contacted Bart about the imminent public-safety danger posed by the wobbling spire.

Bart was not able to rush back from his job, so he contacted Hazel Davis, the church moderator responsible for handling such things as agendas for meetings. Davis rushed over to the building on Church Street and was shocked by the scene before her.

“By the time I got there, the road was blocked,” said Davis. “Fire trucks and police were there, and people from Channel 12… After all was said and done, we contacted the architect who had helped with our window restoration, and he recommended a structural engineering firm whom we contacted.” The firm soon evaluated the steeple damage, and an official fundraising effort was launched.

So, What’s All the New Fuss About?

Ossining has many wonderful old buildings, but not all of them qualify to be placed on the National Register for Historic Places of the United States.  First Baptist Church, however, qualifies as a bona-fide “member” with its handsome Gothic design, stained-glass windows, high-vaulted ceilings, fine interior woodwork, and other architectural attributes.

First Baptist Church also represents 230 years of history and interaction with the Ossining community. From its earliest inception under the guiding hand of Elijah Hunter to the creation of its sister church, Star of Bethlehem, along with the community health organization Open Door, (which started in the church basement), First Baptist Church has made a significant contribution to the local community.

The verbal estimate that the firm gave back in 2014, to repair the steeple was close to $300,000. Today, the cost will likely be 20% to 25% higher, if not more. The entire restoration project has expanded to include repairing the spire, painting the entire building and doing pointing work on the brick. So, the expected costs hovers around one million dollars.

The cost seems higher than one might expect, but Davis explains the cost is partly due to very stringent requirements mandated by the United States Department of the Interior. For example, to maintain its historic status, First Baptist Church is required to ensure that the content balance in the mortar for its brick is the same as that of the original mortar.

Davis still serves as the Steeple Restoration Chair for the committee to oversee the project. Fundraising efforts have been made over the past six years, including starting a GoFundMe account. An application for a grant was submitted in 2019, but it was turned down. As a result of that rejection, fundraising efforts have accelerated.

Giving It Their All and Giving Back

Glenn Courtney, pastor of First Baptist Church, who was being interviewed for his current position at the time of the hazardous steeple issue, says, “Within the first year of my pastorate, in addition to the pre-existing $6,000 in the steeple fund account, we raised $36,000 dollars. Unfortunately, $40,000 dollars is not enough to rebuild a steeple.”

If anyone thinks the church is sitting back twirling its thumbs, think again. Courtney explained, “These past five and a half years, our congregation has been blessed with talent and fundraising ideas such as: Valentine’s Day dinners complete with Italian music in the upper room of the Church arranged by the Sellazzo family and tag sales for the community.”

Still, with a fundraising goal of at least a million dollars, reaching it seems a long way off. Which is why Courtney is making a heart-felt plea to all local history buffs, architecture fans, traditionalists, and members of faith communities: “While the future mission of the church always includes spreading the love of God, human compassion, visiting the sick, showing brother and sisterly love, helping strangers, hospitality, good works and the Great Commission from Matthew 28:19 -20, First Baptist Church also has become very much aware that the goal is not only mission, but mission and maintenance.”

“It’s a truism, but every organization needs to have a combination of both mission and maintenance,” adds Courtney. “Otherwise, an organization’s mission is likely to suffer.” Mission aside, who can argue with his points that “preservation of this historical church is vital to retaining our community’s heritage, which is also part of our nation’s history” or that “being able to see something of our past helps us to better engage with our present, thereby giving us a brighter hope for the future and the next generation.”

In our time, when attending a religious establishment might seem, alas, less vital than it had been in former years, one might well ask, “Why should we protect old buildings?” Perhaps one of the best reasons, along with being a great fundraising appeal, comes from Martin Fox, an art historian, in his response to the www.quora.com question “Should we look after old buildings?” Fox noted: “Some old buildings are extraordinary works of architecture that couldn’t be remade today…. Other buildings are by influential architects and are worth preserving for their aesthetic and historical value.”

Clearly, First Baptist Church of Ossining qualifies on both the aesthetic and the historical levels. Its steeple restoration project includes repairing the steeple and repainting the church. But it represents so much more than that.

Community members may donate directly to First Baptist Church of Ossining (1 Church Street, Ossining, NY 10562) or via their website at www.historicfirstbaptist.org or via GoFundMe